Solution for Procurement and sourcing
Renewed at a rate nobody checked.
The uplift clause was capped when it was signed and uncapped by an amendment two years later, and nothing surfaced that except the invoice. Ragextract reads the supplier book once and puts the price mechanism, the cap and the exit in three columns you can sort.
Free credits on sign-up. No card, no subscription.
| Row | Documents | Price mechanism | Uplift cap | Benchmarking | Exit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Facilities services MSA.pdfAmendment 2.pdf | CPI + 2%, reviewed annually | None since Amendment 2 | No | 90 days, for convenience | |
| Northgate logistics MSA.pdf | Fixed rate card, 3-year term | RPI, capped at 4% | Yes, every 24 months | For cause only | |
| Software subscription.pdfOrder form.pdf | Per seat, tiered by volume | 7% at each renewal | No | None before term end | |
| Print and mail services.pdf | Per unit, minimum volume commitment | Not stated | No | 30 days, either party |
A number you can take into the renegotiation.
“I think that one is CPI-linked” is not a negotiating position. A cell that opens the clause it was read from is, and so is a column that shows every supplier in the category beside each other.
Every answer carries its page and a confidence score, so the checking goes to the four agreements that look wrong rather than across the whole book. When a supplier disputes how their contract was read, the citation settles it in a click.
| Document | Liability cap | Uplift cap |
|---|---|---|
| Facilities MSA +3 | Uncapped for IP and confidentiality | None since Amendment 2 |
The same documents legal is reading.
Legal reads the supplier book for risk — liability, indemnity, IP. Procurement reads it for money and exit. Same paper, different columns, and the argument between the two teams is usually about a document neither has in front of them.
Because reading is charged once, both tables can live in one workspace over one set of documents. The second table pays for its own columns and nothing else, which is what makes it worth building rather than worth asking legal for. The legal page argues the other half.
An agreement is also rarely one document. Bundle each one with its amendments and order forms, most recent first — an uplift cap removed by an amendment is exactly the answer this table exists to surface.
Where it fits.
A row is a supplier relationship, which is usually an agreement plus everything that has been bolted onto it since.
| The work | What a row is |
|---|---|
| Supplier book review | An agreement, with its amendments and order forms |
| Renewal and exit planning | An agreement, as amended |
| Tender and quotation comparison | A supplier response |
| Spend category review | An agreement in the category |
The app ships a Legal & Procurement preset, and it is built for risk review rather than for commercial terms — so the price-and-exit columns above are ones you write, not ones the product hands you. Contract review quotes the preset verbatim and renewals and expiry shows how to add columns of your own to it.
Reading is charged once.
The supplier book is billed for the pages it reads, not for the questions asked of them — and not again when a second team asks different ones. That is the line item worth understanding before deciding who owns the workspace.
| A 150-supplier book | Volume | Cost |
|---|---|---|
| 150 supplier agreements, 25 pages each | 3,750 pages | 3,750 credits |
| 4 commercial questions asked of all 150 | 600 cells | 2,400 credits |
| Legal’s risk table, on the same documents | 600 cells | 2,400 credits |
Nothing on this page is legal or commercial advice about your contracts.
Start with the pile you already have.
Signing up comes with free credits. No card, no subscription.